Affected person knowledge from GP surgical procedures bought to US firms | Politics


Information about hundreds of thousands of NHS sufferers has been bought to US and different worldwide pharmaceutical firms for analysis, the Observer has realized, elevating new fears about America’s rising ambitions to entry profitable elements of the well being service after Brexit.

US medicine giants, together with Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Eli Lilly, have paid the Division of Well being and Social Care, which holds knowledge derived from GPs’ surgical procedures, for licences costing as much as £330,000 every in return for anonymised knowledge for use for analysis.

Campaigners working to guard the privateness of sufferers’ medical histories mentioned they have been involved on the lack of transparency that surrounded the sale of licences and a scarcity of readability about what the information was getting used for.

The latest accounts of the federal government organisation that points the licences, Scientific Apply Analysis Datalink or CPRD, reveal it acquired greater than £10m in income final 12 months.

“Sufferers ought to know the way their knowledge is used. There ought to be no surprises. Whereas professional analysis for public well being profit is to be inspired, it should at all times be consensual, secure and correctly clear,” mentioned Phil Sales space, coordinator of medConfidential, which campaigns for the privateness of well being knowledge.

“Do sufferers know – have they even been advised by the one in seven GP practices throughout England that go on their medical particulars – that their medical histories are being bought to multinational pharma firms within the US and all over the world?”

On Saturday, Dr June Raine, chief government of the Medicines and Healthcare merchandise Regulatory Company (MHRA), a authorities physique that features CPRD, mentioned the sale of information underneath licence to business organisations, in addition to analysis our bodies resembling universities, had been totally compliant with “moral, data governance, authorized and regulatory necessities”. “Rigorous processes” have been in place to make sure the privateness of sufferers, she added.

“Ethically performed analysis utilizing CPRD affected person knowledge units has introduced monumental advantages to affected person care, together with offering proof for the Nationwide Institute for Well being and Care Excellence (NICE) blood-pressure targets for sufferers with diabetes, in addition to working with universities, regulators and the pharmaceutical business who analysis the protection of their medicines,” Raine mentioned.

Final week, a leak of secret authorities papers about non-public discussions between UK and US officers over a post-Brexit commerce deal confirmed that the “free circulate of information” was a “high precedence” for the US.

America seems to be urgent for unrestricted entry to Britain’s 55 million well being data, that are estimated to have a complete worth of £10bn a 12 months. A minute of one of many conferences says: “On knowledge flows, the crucial factor highlighted by the US was settlement that no events will limit data.” One other US demand is for “knowledge localisation” to be dominated out, which means the information of NHS sufferers may very well be saved on cloud servers overseas.

US ambitions to entry UK well being markets have turn out to be a main subject within the common election marketing campaign, with Labour’s chief, Jeremy Corbyn, repeatedly accusing the Tories of getting ready to open up the NHS to US companies throughout talks on a post-Brexit commerce cope with Washington. Boris Johnson has rejected the claims, saying the NHS just isn’t, and by no means will likely be, on the market.

Labour has vowed to assessment the sale of well being knowledge if it wins the election. Corbyn mentioned on Saturday that the revelations proved there was “nothing the Conservatives gained’t promote to maintain US massive enterprise completely happy”, including {that a} authorities that bought “our most non-public knowledge can’t be trusted with our NHS”.

“Boris Johnson’s poisonous commerce cope with Trump will imply the NHS being minimize up and quietly bought off, little by little,” he mentioned. “This election will determine the way forward for our well being service. Whereas the Tories will use our NHS as a bargaining chip, Labour will go a binding legislation to make sure that the NHS is rarely on the desk and provides it the funding it desperately wants.”

Sales space mentioned there was a scarcity of transparency over the sale of information, with details about the businesses shopping for it – and the makes use of to which they put it – not displayed clearly on the related authorities company websites.

He mentioned there was proof on CPRD’s web site that US firms extra to these featured on an inventory supplied to the Observer (after an official request was made) have been utilizing UK knowledge. “Our detailed examination of CPRD’s permitted research exhibits multibillion-dollar firms like Optum, Pfizer and Sanofi named in a number of research over the previous 12 months, however not on the record of licensed business organisations its officers supplied to the Observer.

“Such omissions and lack of transparency are deeply regarding. What else don’t we all know?”



Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply