President Trump took questions from reporters early Saturday morning earlier than leaving Japan for South Korea. He was requested concerning the Democratic debates held earlier within the week and his disparagement of the contestants on Twitter.
“I’m certain you noticed the trade between Joe Biden and Kamala Harris” about former vice chairman Biden’s previous opposition to efforts to combine public faculties by busing college students. Trump mentioned he had.
“The place do you stand on that challenge of federally mandated busing?” the reporter requested. Trump mentioned he would unveil a brand new coverage on the topic in a couple of month.
Later, one other reporter tried to nail him down: Is busing a viable strategy to combine faculties?
“Nicely, it has been one thing that they’ve finished for an extended time period,” Trump replied. “I imply, you already know, there aren’t that some ways you’re going to get folks to varsities. So that is one thing that’s been finished.” He later added, “I believe if vice chairman Biden had answered the query considerably in another way, it will’ve been quite a bit — it will’ve been a unique outcome. As a result of they actually did hit him laborious on that one. So — however it’s definitely a major methodology of getting folks to varsities.”
As The Put up’s Aaron Blake wrote, Trump appears to be suggesting that the controversy is over … whether or not kids ought to take buses in any respect? Which, in fact, it isn’t: It’s whether or not the federal government ought to strive to make sure variety at faculties by bussing college students to totally different amenities than those they’re attending.
Trump’s tweet that Biden fared poorly within the debate obtained some protection, and his remark throughout the identical information convention that Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.) “was given an excessive amount of credit score” for hammering Biden on the problem did as effectively. But it surely’s price taking these assessments with a grain of salt, since Trump apparently didn’t even know what they had been arguing about.
It is price remembering that Trump’s monitor file in political debates just isn’t significantly sturdy. Even pretty beneficiant assessments of the overall election debates in 2016 had Hillary Clinton profitable all three, typically by a large margin. Debating Trump on problems with coverage nuance or truth is commonly like debating Mickey Mantle about cricket: He could also be acquainted with a few of the phrases, however that is most likely nearly as good as it’s going to get.
In December 2015, Trump and the opposite main Republican candidates for the social gathering’s 2016 nomination debated in Las Vegas. One of many moderators was conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt, who requested Trump concerning the nuclear triad, the navy’s three-pronged system for launching nuclear strikes by airplane, submarine and missile. Which of the three was Trump’s precedence, Hewitt requested with out delineating the choices?
Trump hemmed. However did he have a precedence, Hewitt pressed?
“I believe, for me, nuclear is simply the ability, the devastation is essential to me,” Trump mentioned.
Hewitt turned to Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) who then defined the idea to viewers — and to Trump.
To some observers, this appeared lethal to Trump’s probabilities, exposing his ignorance on an idea of serious significance to the presidency. However, in fact, it wasn’t a lot of a roadblock in any respect, partly since many Individuals did not know something about it, both.
That’s most likely the identical factor that may occur with one other of Trump’s responses in Saturday’s information convention. He was requested about Russian President Vladimir Putin’s dismissal of Western liberalism — the embrace of particular person rights and democratic elections that undergirds the American and Western European political techniques. Trump, nevertheless, apparently understood the query to have been about Putin one way or the other disparaging Democrats (liberals) in California (the American West).
To most Individuals, Trump apparently included, this is not a totally irrational bounce to make. In case you’d by no means heard of Western liberalism, you piece collectively the puzzle and maybe equally assume that the topic is San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors. However Trump is not most Individuals. He is the man now in command of that mystical nuclear triad and — particularly by now — ought to presumably be acquainted with the phrases of the political debate.
But, stubbornly, he is not. He is usually detached to understanding what others are speaking about, significantly if it hasn’t been lined on “Fox and Associates.” When he does need to speak about one thing, he is generously detached to accuracy.
We will flip once more to that information convention in Japan. He was requested why he maintained a pleasant posture with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman regardless of the prince’s having ordered the brutal homicide of Washington Put up contributing columnist Jamal Khashoggi final 12 months.
Nicely, the homicide was horrible, Trump mentioned, however folks (excluding the crown prince) had been being prosecuted. He then defended sustaining a powerful relationship with Saudi Arabia.
“They have been a terrific ally,” Trump mentioned of Saudi Arabia. “They’re creating hundreds of thousands of jobs on this nation. They’re ordering gear, not solely navy gear, however $400 billion price of — and, really, much more than that over a interval time — price of various issues.”
We’ve fact-checked this earlier than. Each the variety of jobs (touted as “tens of hundreds” by the White Home up to now) and greenback quantity (which stems from nonexistent agreements) are wildly off the mark, as Trump ought to certainly know by now. Our fact-check was in October, so he’s had eight months to set issues straight. But right here we’re.
The extent to which the Saudis bolstering American jobs is a protection in opposition to a senior authorities official allegedly ordering the dismemberment of a member of the American press is one other level solely, in fact.
The really outstanding side to all of that is that the bar Trump confronted in December 2015 because the Republican primaries approached and even into the 2016 normal election ought to have been a lot decrease than it’s now. Trump obtained a cross on the nuclear triad and gained the nomination; honest sufficient. Clinton simply bested him on coverage within the presidential debates however he gained the presidency — partly on the power of his indifference concerning the nuances of Washington rhetoric.
As president, Trump continues to be blithely unaware of the broader political dialog however reveals little hesitation about weighing in on it anyway. He is repeatedly been proven to offer incorrect data however is completely disinterested in doing something about it. For this, he pays no political value past his ongoing failure to achieve any new assist from anyplace.
It’s not an enormous stretch to imagine that President Trump will lose the 2020 presidential debates as certainly as he misplaced to Clinton, no matter who he runs in opposition to. Debates are about tone and taglines as a lot as coverage and knowledgeable opinions, in fact, and Trump does fantastic on the previous. However this week, from the primary a part of the Democratic debate on Wednesday to Saturday’s information convention, highlighted simply how stark the variations are between the approaches taken to political argument by the 2 events’ presidential candidates.
In 2016, Trump’s model gained out.